How to Choose Which Futures Contract to Trade
Most beginners pick a contract because someone on the internet mentioned it. There are five questions that actually determine suitability, and four of them are about you rather than the market.
Question 1: Can you size one contract inside your risk limit?
This eliminates most contracts immediately and it is the only question that cannot be negotiated.
contracts = risk budget ÷ (stop in ticks × tick value)
If that gives you less than one contract, the contract is too big — use the micro version or a different product.
Example: $10,000 account, 1% risk = $100
| Contract | Typical stop | Risk per contract | Fits? |
|---|---|---|---|
| ES | 12 ticks | $150 | ❌ No |
| MES | 12 ticks | $15 | ✅ Yes (6 contracts) |
| CL | 10 ticks | $100 | ⚠️ Exactly 1 |
| MCL | 10 ticks | $10 | ✅ Yes (10 contracts) |
| GC | 15 ticks | $150 | ❌ No |
| MGC | 15 ticks | $15 | ✅ Yes |
Notice the pattern: on a $10,000 account, only the micros work. That is not a limitation of your skill — it is arithmetic.
Question 2: Can you afford the commission drag?
A tick value of $1.25 with a $0.75 round turn leaves $0.50. The same $0.75 on a $12.50 tick leaves $11.75. Micros are cheap in dollars and expensive in percentage — a scalping strategy that works on ES will not survive on MES.
See ES vs MES for the full comparison.
Question 3: Can you trade the session?
If you are awake and available during Asian hours and the contract only has real liquidity during the US session, you are trading a different, worse market. Check the session table in trading hours.
Question 4: Does the contract's volatility match your stop style?
| Contract | Character | Suitable for |
|---|---|---|
| ES / MES | Moderate, very liquid | Learning, most strategies |
| NQ / MNQ | Higher beta, bigger ranges | Traders who size by volatility |
| CL / MCL | Event-driven, news sensitive | Those comfortable with gaps |
| NG / MNG | Extremely volatile, seasonal | Experienced only |
| GC / MGC | Smoother trends, slower | Trend following |
| ZB / ZN | Low volatility, fraction pricing | Spread and macro traders |
| Grains | Seasonal, limit moves | Those who understand limit risk |
Question 5: Do you understand its quoting convention?
Four conventions break the standard formula, and all four are covered on this site:
- Fractional 32nds — ZB, ZN, ZF, ZT (explained)
- Quarters of a cent — grains, with 445-4 meaning $4.46
- Cents per pound — copper, where 4.25 means $4.25 not $0.0425
- Non-USD settlement — Eurex, JPX, HKFE contracts
If you cannot state the unit and the tick value without looking, you are not ready to size a position in it.
The default answer for a new trader
MES. It is liquid, it ticks in familiar index points, its tick value is small enough to size on a modest account, its quote convention is standard, and it trades nearly around the clock. The main cost is commission drag, which only matters if you trade very frequently.
Move to ES when one contract fits your risk budget with room to spare, not before.
A note on conviction
None of this says which market will go up. Contract selection is about size, cost and mechanics — the direction question is separate, and no amount of specification knowledge substitutes for a tested method.
Most-looked-up contracts
- E-mini S&P 500 (ES)
- E-mini Nasdaq-100 (NQ)
- Crude Oil (CL)
- Gold (GC)
- Euro FX (6E)
- Corn (ZC)
- Silver (SI)
- Natural Gas (NG)
- Copper (HG)
Complete list of all 135: futures contract specifications.